Dr. Klinke published new article on risk governance

Dr. Klinke presented at the Regulatory Governance Conference in Hong Kong
August 19, 2019
Dr. Klinke joins the IASS as Affiliate Scholar
August 30, 2019

Andreas Klinke together with Ortwin Renn published a new survey and review article entitled “The Coming of Age of Risk Governance” in the journal Risk Analysis, which is the official international journal of the Society of Risk Analysis. The journal is the world-wide-leading journal in the interdisciplinary field of risk sciences and a focal point for new developments in the theory and practice of risk analysis for researchers and practitioners from a wide range of disciplines. For more details, please contact Andreas Klinke.

Abstract: Proposed as an advanced conceptualization of how to handle risk, risk governance begins with the critique and expansion of the traditional idea and standard practices of risk analysis. In developments over the last two decades, proponents of a more integrative approach on governing risks have moved further away from distinct conceptions of risk assessment, risk management and risk communication and towards the processes and institutions that guide, restrain and integrate collective activities of handling risk. In early formulations of what risk governance entails, the superiority of the interplay between risk evaluation and risk management over linear and simple deductions from risk assessment to risk management was established precisely by developing a distinctive rationality of how to proceed. Later, the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) recaptured this distinctive rationality that institutionalized processes should embody the interplay of the assessment of risks and related concerns, their socio-political appraisal and the logical inference for risk management. Lately, this approach has been refined and augmented towards an integrative and adaptive concept of risk governance and towards a post-normal conception of risk governance. Main characteristics are a new concept of differentiated responsibility and deliberation in which expertise, experience and tacit knowledge are integrated forming the core of legitimate political risk decision-making.